The standards revolution here in Holland proceeds apace, so I though I'd give you an update. Most importantly, I have finally managed to find an English translation of the Guidelines, which will allow non-Dutch-speakers to judge them for themselves. I added a few notes to clarify translation points or vague spots.
One of the most important comments on my previous Guidelines post was: "Who's going to enforce them?". The answer seems to be: nobody. Far from being a weak point in the standards revolution, this non-enforcement is one of the strongest reasons in favour of implementing the Guidelines.
My previous post was incorrect on one point: the Guidelines form not a law, but ... well ... a guideline, an advice. They're not binding in any way.
All national Dutch ministries have voluntarily agreed to implement the Guidelines as soon as possible. During the next few weeks I'll be able to judge (at least) two ministries' intent for myself, but the very fact that they're asking standards-aware web developers to help them out already shows they're serious about the Guidelines.
Other than the ministries, no government branch (or corporate entity) is required to implement the Guidelines. However, this lack of enforcement is expected to speed up their adoption. If the Guidelines were required by law, most government branches would get all defensive and buttoned-up, and would remain stuck in a "we've always done it like this, so why change it?" mentality in order to defend their hard-won autonomy.
Conversely, now that the Guidelines have the status of advice, they're not threatening anybody's acquired rights, but are simply a series of best practices promulgated by a government body known for its specialist knowledge of this area, and helped along by the example the national ministries are setting. Therefore, the Guidelines have become much more palatable for other government branches.
It all boils down to politics.
Although I feel the Web Guidelines could become a Dutch export product, I'm not certain if this "advisory approach" is suited to other countries that are used to a more hierarchical way of working. Web developers and government entities in other countries will have to decide these sensitive issues for themselves.
In addition, there are quite a few groups and committees here in Holland (and I suppose in the rest of Europe, too) that work on accessibility and 'inclusive governance' in all kinds of ways; not just the Web versions. At least two Dutch committees are rumoured to have the Web Guidelines on their agendas, for the simple and sufficient reason that they're already there and are ready to be discussed. The Web Guidelines could therefore grow to become an example for accessibility and inclusion guidelines and advices in other sectors.
All in all I'm quite happy with the progress that's being made. Although government, being a bureaucratic entity, moves slowly, it is definitely moving in the right direction.
Meanwhile I'm going to concentrate on spreading the word within the Dutch-speaking web development community, in close cooperation with the WaSP ILG. Practical possibilities are currently under discussion, and I'll publish them as soon as they move beyond the tentative phase.
I’m speaking at the following conferences:
Comments are closed.